Valerio De Biagi

UDC 69.059.1:699.84


Politecnico Di Torino,

C.So Duca Degli Abruzzi, 24, Torino, 10129, Italy


Structural robustness is considered a fundamental prerequisite in the design of structures. In particular, attention has to be paid to events that are unforecastable and with no known magnitude. Referring to an idea by Donald Rumsfeld, these are unknown unknowns. Among all the possible strategies for ensuring robustness, alternating the load paths on the structures may represent a feasible design solution. Structural complexity is a novel metrics for measuring the amount of interaction between hypothetical load paths on a structure. Maximum complexity corresponds to maximum interaction. In the paper, the links between structural complexity and robustness are investigated.

Keywords: robustness; structural engineering; extreme event; structural complexity.


  1. Taleb N.N. The Black Swan: The impact of the highly improbable [Чёрныйлебедь. Подзнакомнепредсказуемости]. Random House Trade Paperbacks. 2007.
  2. Starossek U., Wolff M. Design of collapse-resistant structures [Проектирование устойчивых конструкций].JCSS and IABSE workshop on Robustness of structures, building research establishment, Garston, Watford, UK. 2005.
  3. Abrams D.P. Consequence-based engineering approaches for reducing loss in mid-America [Технические подходы к уменьшению потерь в центральной Америке].Conference on Apr 4, 2002 at Notre-Dame University. 2002.
  4. Nafday A.M. Consequence-based structural design approach for Black Swan Events [Последовательныйподходк проектированию конструкцийсучетомсобытийчерноголебедя].Structural Safety. 2011.No 33.Рp. 108–114.
  5. Pearson C., Delatte N. Ronan Point apartment tower collapse and its effect on building codes [Разрушение квартирыв башне Ronan Pointиеговлияниенастроительныенормы].Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 2005.No 19. – Pp. 172–177.
  6. Santa Fe Institute. Working definitions of robustness[Определения живучести]. Rs-2001-009 Edition. 2001.
  7. Starossek U., Haberland M. Disproportionate collapse: terminology and procedures [Непропорциональное разрушение: терминология и процедуры].Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 2010.No 24.Рp. 519–528.
  8. Knoll F., Vogel T. Design for robustness [Проектирование живучести].International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering. Zurich.
  9. Starossek U., Haberland M. Robustness of structures [Живучесть конструкций].International Journal of Lifecycle Performance Engineering. 2012.No 1.Рp. 3–21.
  10. Starossek U. Disproportionate collapse: a pragmatic approach [Непропорциональное разрушение: прагматичныйподход].Proceedings of the ICE-Structures and Buildings. 2007.No 160.Рp. 317–325.
  11. Wood J.G. Paris airport terminal collapse: lessons for the future [Разрушение терминала в аэропорту Парижа: уроки будущего].Structural Engineer. 2005. 83.
  12. Cennamo C., Chiaia, B., De Biagi, V., Placidi, L. Monitoring and compartimentalized structures [Наблюдение за секционнымиконструкциями]. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik – accepted, in print.
  13. Diamantidis, D., Vogel, T. Designing for robustness [Проектирование живучести].Structural robustness design for practising engineers – COST Action TU0601 Robustness of structures. 2011.Pp. 65–84.
  14. De Biagi V. Complexity and robustness of structures against extreme events [Сложность и живучесть конструкций в экстремальных условиях]. PhD Thesis, Politecnico di Torino. 2014.
  15. De Biagi, V., Chiaia, B. Complexity and robustness of frame structures [Сложность и живучесть рамных конструкций].International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2013.No 50.Pp. 3723–3741.
  16. Simon, H.A. The architecture of complexity [Архитектура сложности].Proceedings Of The American Philosophical Society. 1962.No 106.Рp. 467–482.
  17. Shannon, C.E. A mathematical theory of communication [Математическая теория коммуникации].Bell System Technical Journal. 1948.No 27.Рp. 379–423.
  18. Gray, R. Entropy and Information Theory [Энтропия и теория информации]. Springer-Verlag, Wien, 2011.
  19. De Biagi V., Chiaia, B. Damage tolerance in parallel systems [Допустимость повреждений в параллельных системах].Submitted.
  20. De Biagi, V., Chiaia, B. Scaling in structural complexity [Масштабирование в структурной сложности].Complexity. 2014.No 20.Рp. 57–63.
  21. De Biagi, V., Chiaia, B. Robustness of structures: Role of graph complexity [Живучесть конструкций: роль графической сложности]. IABSE Symposium Report. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering. 2013.No 100.Pp. 136–143.
  22. De Biagi, V., Chiaia, B. M., Placidi, L. Complexity and robustness of frame structure[Сложность и живучесть рамных конструкций]. XXI Congresso AIMETA, Torino. 2013 131 p.

Full text | (551 Кб)